does Nr. 6 (the Legal Trap) require h3? It seems the trap would work if the knight captures on e5 immediately after Bg4. Or am I overlooking something?
Did this without playing h3😭😭… opponent took Ncxe5 and i blundered my knight for free while his bishop remained defended by his knight…I have changed my name to "H3" now🥲
Here's my question about the Lasker trap. Okay, you finally changed your pawn to a knight. You gave the opponent a check. However, what would you do if your opponent didn't move his king, but his rook, and removed your 3rd knight instead? Why wouldn't he take your knight with his rook?
Dude. As I fan of gambit line opening I never do the trades that set up the traps. Alteast 3 and 4. This is a reason why never experimented those traps being played on me
The biggest flaw in the lecture on the Lasker Trap is that when the black pawn comes to the last row and becomes a black knight, it is situated next to the white rook. The room is not threatened and can instantly capture the newly promoted knight.
they are all useless traps they only work agains people who dont think
6:53 the rook can take bruh
does Nr. 6 (the Legal Trap) require h3? It seems the trap would work if the knight captures on e5 immediately after Bg4. Or am I overlooking something?
This is bad🤮🤢🤮🤮
chrap
Hi Kevin and guys! In the Legal trap (1st trap), whats the difference in h2 and then Ne5 or just Ne5 directly?
Did this without playing h3😭😭… opponent took Ncxe5 and i blundered my knight for free while his bishop remained defended by his knight…I have changed my name to "H3" now🥲
At #3 what if rook takes g1 knight?
After billions of gameplay you can…
5:21 this is so cap when he says he is up material lol
Thank you!
The. Cooli
Una sugerencia debes de crear un canal para las personas q hablan español. Saludos
6:55 Rook takes horse. 😂
For the lasker trap at 7:07, why can’t the rook just attack the pawn turned knight?
Dont know why in the first example you moved H2 to H3. Cant see why it wouldn't work if you immediately move F3 to E5.
Whenever I see the knight on the queen side coming out I instinctively bring my pawn out to deny it access to my half of the board
The third “trap”the pawn can simply capture the attacking pawn it’s the obvious better move
why doesnt the rook just take the knight at 6:56
White
King pawn: 0:43 (Three Knights Opening) – good start 9/10
Black:
King pawn: 1:49 (Italian Game) – unlikely 3/10
King pawn: 7:45 (Englund Gambit) – unlikely 6/10
King pawn: 9:41 (Ruy López Opening) – excellent 10/10
Queen pawn: 4:10 (Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern, Knight Defense) – rare, but effective 9/10
Queen pawn: 5:28 (Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit) rare, but effective 9/10
Yo jugaría. .N:e5Q:h5N:c4 y los blancos perdan figura!!
Here's my question about the Lasker trap. Okay, you finally changed your pawn to a knight. You gave the opponent a check. However, what would you do if your opponent didn't move his king, but his rook, and removed your 3rd knight instead? Why wouldn't he take your knight with his rook?
In lasker gambit,,why didnt just take the promoted knight with the rook?
The thing about these traps is that they rely heavily on your opponent following the script…how often are these traps actually successful?
The key to chess is to make the best move.
Needs more fried liver
I really don't understand what is going on 😂lol
When playing the legal trap try asking for a draw to trick your opponent to think you blundered
Next video must be how to destroy people who use the gambits
Why not the castle just taking the pawn that becomes a knight in the Lasker trap?! Am I missing something?
SOORRY BUT ONLY IDIOTS FALL FOR THESE GAMBITS AND YOU DON'T NEED GAMBITS TO PLAY IDIOTS. YOU WILL BEAT THEM ANYWAYS
What’s the point of moving to h3 in the legal trap?
What if in black’ s second move it move pawn to d6 or other pawn to f6
Elephant trap seems weird. Black is only up by a knight after all that
On legal trap why do you have to push the h pawn?
Accept Jesus now he's coming he, s the son of god
hit your opponent's face with the chess. that's the real trap😅✌️
Thanks!
Warning dont try this at match 😂
This video is worth a like and a sub 🙂
Dude. As I fan of gambit line opening I never do the trades that set up the traps. Alteast 3 and 4. This is a reason why never experimented those traps being played on me
Nice 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Nice video
The biggest flaw in the lecture on the Lasker Trap is that when the black pawn comes to the last row and becomes a black knight, it is situated next to the white rook. The room is not threatened and can instantly capture the newly promoted knight.
3:32 I recommend Nxc2 and Qxc2 might be a kind of ; sort of a good move.
06:47 by king can't kill Pon?
At 7:00 why didn't the rook kill the knight?
3:57 why not bxf3?
6:46 why not kxf2?
Very nice
How is the legal trap checkmate when the d6 pawn can capture the knight